| Summary | How can I Create a Jingle::Content object by using a Tag instance? |
| Queue | gloox |
| Queue Version | 1.0.10 |
| Type | Bug |
| State | Unconfirmed |
| Priority | 1. Low |
| Owners | js (at) camaya (dot) net |
| Requester | leerymatthew (at) gmail (dot) com |
| Created | 04/15/2014 (3343 days ago) |
| Due | |
| Updated | 04/16/2014 (3342 days ago) |
| Assigned | |
| Resolved |
Do you need the PluginFactory? Or does it not work for you because
the Content ctor checks for factory == 0?
say, it do not works because the Content ctor checks for factory == 0
Do you need the PluginFactory? Or does it not work for you because the
Content ctor checks for factory == 0?
is private because it is intended for internal use only, i.e. to
parse incoming stanzas.
What is your use case? Why do you have a Tag that you want to use to
create a Content object?
ctor is not private now, the PluginFactory() ctor is private.
Secondly, I want to send some strings to remote, so I just pack them
into a tag object, it's very flexible I think.
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Assigned to Jakob Schröter
private because it is intended for internal use only, i.e. to parse
incoming stanzas.
What is your use case? Why do you have a Tag that you want to use to
create a Content object?
State ⇒ Unconfirmed
Priority ⇒ 3. High
Type ⇒ Bug
Summary ⇒ How can I Create a Jingle::Content object by using a Tag instance?
Queue ⇒ gloox
Tag* tag = 0, PluginFactory* factory = 0 ), but the PluginFactory's
constructor is private. How should I do this?